Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1560

reference
506-tree-1
name
1560
tree-preservation-order

undefined

506-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.039684 50.885943)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.039585 50.885933,-1.039590 50.885952,-1.039603 50.885970,-1.039625 50.885984,-1.039653 50.885993,-1.039683 50.885996,-1.039714 50.885993,-1.039742 50.885985,-1.039764 50.885971,-1.039779 50.885954,-1.039784 50.885934,-1.039780 50.885915,-1.039766 50.885897,-1.039744 50.885883,-1.039717 50.885874,-1.039686 50.885870,-1.039655 50.885873,-1.039627 50.885882,-1.039605 50.885896,-1.039590 50.885913,-1.039585 50.885933)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL